top of page
bookcat

Privatizing Government II


Yale Open Course <Power and Politics in Today's World>

Lecture 5: The Resurgent Right in the West



Notes


Privatizing gov functions in the US

  • Bill Clinton Dec 1994 - “stop making govts do what they are not good at”

  • Starts in the 1980s and continues throughout the 1990s (Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II)

  • 1993 National Performance Review - “aggressive outsourcing of govt work” → 426K federal jobs eliminated

  • By 2001, more contract workforce than civilian employees in the Pentagon


Privatizing the military

  • Private contractors have always participated in wars in the past

  • Iraq war - almost the same number of contractors & military troops

  • Afghanistan war = contractors > troops

  • Private contractors do all functions except for front-line/offensive fighting

    • G4S: 625K employees; routine security, heavily-armed security, etc

    • Erinys: mostly in Africa & Iraq; protect energy assets

    • Asia Security Group: Kabul HQ protecting officials

    • DynCorp: policing missions

    • Academi: notoriously aggressive tactics; incidents of uncontrollable contractors

      • Montreaux document: agreement on good military practices for countries employing private contractors

    • Afghanistan - heavy reliance on local populations for employees

  • Host Nation Trucking in Afghanistan

    • US in 2001 in Afghanistan to support Northern Alliance (the losing side) in the civil war

      • But the losing side had no good prospect for governing

        • seen as an American puppet government; no real control over the country

    • How to move around the personnel & supplies in an unsecure regions?

      • Used increasingly more contractors than troops → didn't want a lot of American casualties (political costs)

        • For guarding convoys, the locals know the terrain better but also know how to take advantage of their situation

        • Paid the people (the Taliban) who would’ve attacked the convoys

          • Funding the guerilla movement that the US was fighting


Consequences of increased reliance on PMCs (private military contractors)?

  • Assuming efficiency gains, it saves money

  • Can fight otherwise unpopular wars → good or bad?

    • Undemocratic; gives incentives to fight more wars

  • Republican Theory of the US founders

    • should have standing/professional armies (they encourage wars)? wars only if really necessary

      • if you can’t mobilize citizenry, maybe the war shouldn’t be fought

  • Democratic peace theory

    • Democratic countries tend not to fight each other

      • and only fight wars they are going to win

      • difficult to get people to fight without a winning prospect

  • If it’s easier to start a war with PMCs and pay the war with debt → democratic peace theory might no longer apply


The US prison industry

  • the US a huge outlier: highest incarceration rate; accelerated rate starting in the 1980s especially for non-white males

  • 60s, 70s - advances in treatment of psychiatric disorders

    • patients released from mental hospitals

      • Also coincides with govt fiscal crises

      • states saved money by de-institutionalizing mental health patients

        • Many of the released patients ended up in the criminal population

  • what drove the increase in incarceration?

    • war on drugs

    • 1980s mandatory sentencing shifting power from judges to prosecutors (3 strikes law)

      • more punitive sentencing

  • minorities disproportionally incarcerated

  • political implication - felon disenfranchisement laws

    • ex. KY, VA - permanently disenfranchised if had felony conviction

    • Disenfranchisement of the black voting population

  • Paradox: violent crime has been falling

  • why lock up more people when violent crimes are coming down?

    • Locking up people for non-violent crimes

    • Demography?

      • As the baby boom bulge ages, fewer people to commit crimes

    • Roe vs. Wade?

      • Those likely to commit crime are not being born → controversial hypothesis

    • Education of women?

      • Education/labor force participation of women increase → decrease in violent crime

    • no consensus on the cause

  • People are not aware that violent crime is actually decreasing

    • being tough on crime - cheap talk for politicians

  • Decline of incarceration

    • due to cost

    • BUT private sector prison imprisonment increasing


Weber’s definition of state: monopoly on the legitimate use of force in a given territory

  • Military / prison - contracting out government monopoly

  • Creates ‘principle-agent problem’

    • Principle contracts out to the agent, the agent has more information that the principal needs

    • nested principle agent problem

      • solution: increase competition; prison industry low competition, currently huge cost to entry

        • military somewhat more competitive; but govts not going to switch contractors

      • Better alignment of interests of the agents with the state?

        • Difficult to do that; industries have very different incentives

          • Ex. need inmates to run prisons

          • increasing prison lobbying for:

          • lockup quotas

          • stiffer penalties

          • immigration enforcement

          • Ex. better for military industry to have long wars

      • monitoring?

        • difficult to do with no visibility and control over the doings of the contractors/subcontractors




Comments


bottom of page